Opened by root at 2004-07-29 16:24
User since
2003-08-08
2561 Artikel
HausmeisterIn
![[Homepage]](/battie/theme/default/homepage.gif)
![[default_avatar]](/battie/theme/default/default_avatar.gif)
2003-08-08
2561 Artikel
HausmeisterIn
Mich wundert, dass das implizite Abfragen von @_ von root schneller ist als die lexikalische Lösung von renee.
QuoteBenchmark: timing 1000000 iterations of renee, root...
renee: 16 wallclock secs (14.55 usr + 0.00 sys = 14.55 CPU) @ 68742.70/s (n=1000000)
root: 8 wallclock secs ( 7.55 usr + 0.00 sys = 7.55 CPU) @ 132520.54/s (n=1000000)
Gruß, Erik!
s))91\&\/\^z->sub{}\(\@new\)=>69\&\/\^z->sub{}\(\@new\)=>124\&\/\^z->sub{}\(\@new\)=>);
$_.=qq~66\&\/\^z->sub{}\(\@new\)=>93~;for(@_=split(/\&\/\^z->sub{}\(\@new\)=>/)){print chr;}
It's not a bug, it's a feature! - [CGI-World.de]
s))91\&\/\^z->sub{}\(\@new\)=>69\&\/\^z->sub{}\(\@new\)=>124\&\/\^z->sub{}\(\@new\)=>);
$_.=qq~66\&\/\^z->sub{}\(\@new\)=>93~;for(@_=split(/\&\/\^z->sub{}\(\@new\)=>/)){print chr;}
It's not a bug, it's a feature! - [CGI-World.de]